Tag: kelly explores

Kelly Explores: A Wonder Woman Movie

About a month ago, I bought the first trade of the New 52 Wonder Woman for my 13-year-old cousin. Because she’s young and people on the internet can be creepers (and off the internet, if we’re being completely honest), I’ll just refer to her as Bee for this article.

Kelly Jackson. The latest contributor to WonderWorldComics.com

I got home from work today and as soon as I walked in the door, Bee gave me this HUGE smile and said, “Kelly, I finished Wonder Woman!”

“Did you like it?” I asked.

Bee nodded excitedly.

“What did you like about it?”

“She fights a lot and she wins!”

I laughed. “What was your favorite part?”

“The part where she fights! I was kinda bored with it so I sort of stopped paying attention but then Wonder Woman was fighting and I got interested again.”

Then she asked the ultimate question: “When does the Wonder Woman movie come out?”

I had to explain to her that they aren’t making a Wonder Woman movie. Some people want to, but there are roadblocks all over the place, and there are some executives who think that it’s just too hard; Wonder Woman doesn’t have “a single, clear, compelling” origin story and that makes it really difficult to write a movie for her.

READ: “We’re trying so hard (but not really) to make a great movie (but not really), but we’re having such a problem because Wonder Woman’s too complex. WRITING GIRLS IS HARD, OKAY?”

Bee was not at all happy to hear this. In her words, not mine: “Wonder Woman is just like Batman. She’s fighting a she’s trying to do the right thing and why won’t they make a movie for HER, but they’ve made a whole bunch for Batman!”

From the mouths of babes. Bee’s absolutely right, by the way. There really is no excuse for DC/Warner Brothers NOT to have a Wonder Woman movie planned, cast, and filming right now. And Bee’s brother, we’ll call him R, made a great point, too, which I’ve seen floating around in memes:

Isn’t Marvel doing a movie starring Rocket Raccoon? I didn’t even know who that was before the Marvel vs. Capcom game.”

Bee’s response was priceless: “BUT THERE’S NO WONDER WOMAN MOVIE?!”

Take heed, DC/Warner Brothers: You’re really pissing off a young generation that’s all but begging you to make this movie. Bee is most definitely not the only teenaged girl who wants to see Wonder Woman kick some ass onscreen. Maybe you ought to use some of the millions you made from the Dark Knight franchise to survey young audience members and ask what they want. Just a suggestion.

Kelly Explores: Weaknesses of Female Superhero Teams

(This is part three of a three-part series of articles regarding current runs of all-female superhero teams.)

I’ve legitimately been working on this article or thinking about this article for weeks. How do I write an article on the weaknesses of the all-female teams out there? And how do I do it in a way that allows me to stay true to my own theory and ideology? I finally have an answer:

I don’t.

I could rant for pages about how Birds of Prey has turned into a giant cat-fight over a big, strong man. I could focus on how X-Men is so boring, I might actually drop it from my pull. I might discuss the strange implications of gender structure that I see in Fearless Defenders. But at the end of the day, one article isn’t enough to list all the negatives or the weaknesses that I see. So instead, I’m making a wish list. Comic writers and artists, take note, and let me know if you have any questions.

  1. Stop with the inappropriately-clad crime fighters. Spandex is fine. Capes are awesome. Stilettos are ridiculous. Super-cleavage is impractical. I could literally live the rest of my life without seeing a female hero wearing a damned tiara. Stop it.
  2. Women’s lives revolve around a LOT of things, alright? We’ve got a lot going on. Men are in the periphery. They always have been and they always will be. We’ve got more important things to do than go super-villain over how Mister Dudebro broke our hearts. Seriously. I promise. So maybe make the main plot be about the women actually fighting crime instead of fighting each other about the nearest penis in the vicinity.
  3. It’s not just men who are clever and witty. Women are, too. We can have witty dialogue, too. We can even joke around about sexual things. Crazy idea, I know, but it’s true.
  4. It’s okay to show a woman having some sort of inner conflict. She doesn’t always have to be confident, just like she doesn’t always have to be weak. In fact, we experience a whole range of emotions. So if a woman shows a moment of weakness, that’s okay. Men do, too.

When it comes right down to it, my problem with all-female teams is that the women seem to become caricatures. They aren’t real and they can’t be real because they don’t have a male in the area to show them how to be. Think about that for a moment. And I mean really think about it.

What’s lacking in these three runs isn’t just one thing or another, it’s a whole litany of things. And much as I enjoyed Fearless Defenders (so much so that I added it to my pull), even it isn’t exactly what I was looking for.

On the other hand, have you picked up Rat Queens? If not, DO IT. I command you. I promise you it’s well worth your while, and you won’t see me screaming at it in sheer feminist rage.

Kelly Explores: The Focus of Female Superhero Teams

(This is part one of a three-part series of articles regarding current runs of all-female superhero teams.)

When I started reading Marvel’s all-female X-Men team, I was completely unaware that DC had been doing this with Birds of Prey for at least a dozen issues. Part of that is due to my own bias (I’m a Marvel girl and I’m not afraid to admit that), and part of it is due to my still-present comic industry naivete. But I was also entirely clueless when Marvel put out Fearless Defenders, another all-female team, so I don’t feel too guilty about my brand preference.

But I digress.

Larry suggested I read a couple issues of Birds of Prey and Fearless Defenders, and then compare them to X-Men with the end goal of declaring a winning all-female team. Of these three teams, which one is the best? For me, of course, this question actually means, “Which one of these teams do you find least annoying, and which one do you think actually does a good job in presenting an all-female team without a massive boatload of stereotypes?”

Let’s start with the current focus of the storylines, shall we? X-Men‘s main plot is revolving around how two of the women are completely unable to concentrate on the problems at hand because they’re too busy trying to claim the role of alpha female while Jubilee’s adopted baby keeps being a cute baby. Birds of Prey is about two blonde women, one “good” and one “evil,” fighting over an attractive, sensitive man while a male villain in charge of a bunch of female villains is subtly threatening rape and murder of the “good” blonde. Fearless Defenders is about a mysterious, evil group that’s trying to genetically engineer creepy alien beings in order to presumably take over Earth and kill the superheroes.

So in these three series’, what we have is the focus on a baby, the focus on a man/romantic interlude, and the focus on an actual plot that superheroes should maybe be focused on because they’re superheroes and superheroes focus on issues that threaten THEIR PLANET AND THEN FIGHT THAT EVIL AND EVENTUALLY WIN BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT SUPERHEROES DO, DAMN IT. Thank you, Fearless Defenders, for ACTUALLY BEING SUPERHEROES.

I have no problem with stories involving a love triangle or a baby or catty insults and fights. These things happen. It’s fine. But why is it the main focus? And how come when I read Battle of the Atom or Lazarus or even Red Sonja, the main focus is actually on something … I don’t know … important? Even in Love Stories to Die For, which is ABOUT LOVE STORIES, the focus isn’t on the romance, but on much larger issues (like how the people who think are good can actually be very, very bad).

I’m taking a very deep breath right now.

In the next two parts of this series, I’ll go more in-depth about the strengths of all three series’ and then the weaknesses of them. But I thought it was important to give you a glimpse of how I’ve read these stories and my initial thoughts coming out of them. And if you think this article was rage-filled, just wait until I actually start to pick things apart.

Kelly Explores: Confidence, Costumes, and Society’s Standard of Beauty

This year will be the first year I’ve attended Detroit Fanfare Comic Con, and I’m pretty excited to be involved with it. I have the feeling it’s going to be a great experience, and there’s going to be a lot of fun things to do. A 24-hour game room, the zombie walk, and an adult costume party. Well, it’s a comics convention, so obviously I want to dress in the costume of a comics character. Red Sonja is amazing and kickass, so why not dress up as her?

I’m going to do it. I’m going to wear that chain-mail bikini and get a long, red wig. The works. But I have a confession to make: I am completely terrified to do this.

I work a lot in feminist theory and body politics, and one of the biggest arguments for body-positive imagery is that no matter what your body “type,” you can wear whatever you want, and if anyone else has a problem with that, they can simply not look at you. No big deal. Our acceptance of “beauty” is based entirely on social pressures and print and film media, and not everyone fits into that particular pinhole of “beauty.” In fact, only approximately 4% of the female population in the United States can look anything like a Hollywood actress or a model. The other 96% fall somewhere between “average” and “morbidly obese,” modifiers based on completely bunk science in the first place. But I digress.

I am not skinny. I am also not fat. According to the BMI, I am most definitely obese; I stand at 5’5” and weigh 190lbs (whew, I can’t believe I just put that out there in the Internet for the world to see). And yet, I’m perfectly healthy (for the most part, despite a chronic illness that has nothing to do with weight and everything to do with my reproductive organs wanting to kill me); my blood pressure is actually low, my cholesterol is “beautiful” according to my doctor, and I can do moderate exercise without becoming winded or my heart rate soaring out of control. All told, I actually rather like my body. I’ve got curves, I have great breasts, and I like my chest-waist-hip proportions.

But no amount of self-confidence can outweigh (pun intended) the fact that, according to mainstream societal standards, I’m just another overweight woman. And as much as I’d like to say that I’m educated about the system and I know precisely why the media capitalizes on making skinny equal to beautiful and I know exactly why the diet industry is so financially successful yet statistically dreadful… I still have that voice in the back of my head. I think we all do. That voice which, when I look in the mirror, sneers, “Look at those rolls of fat. Look how chunky you are. God, your arms are so ugly. How many chins do you have? No one could ever find you attractive.” And I can fight back against that voice and tell it to shut up, that I’m not bending to its will or its whim of what someone else wants me to think is “perfect.”

To add to the inner voice of let-me-make-you-feel-like-you’re-worthless, we have a lot of fat-shaming and slut-shaming going on, even within Geek Culture, which you would think should be one of the most accepting cultural groups around. If you doubt this, watch a few episodes of SyFy’s new series Heroes of Cosplay. So it’s not enough that I’m playing directly into the panopticon of perceived perfection, I’m also being bombarded with very direct statements telling me I can’t do X because Y says so, and if I do X, Z will happen.

With all of this in mind, I’ve been bouncing back and forth as to whether I want to dress up in a Red Sonja costume or figure out a reason to wear a high-necked Victorian dress that covers every part of everything on my body. Strangely, there’s no in-between in that. And my thoughts have split down the middle; one perspective is telling me that I can do whatever I want, dress however I want, and enjoy being myself and showing everyone else that they can all back off with their judgment, because I’ve got much more important things on my mind other than whether some random stranger finds me to be visually pleasing; the other perspective is telling me that dressing in something that shows off my body is purposely opening myself up to the very condescension and convoluted thinking that I’m planning on spending the rest of my life to fight against.

In the end, I’ve made a pretty public declaration that I will be rocking a Red Sonja costume, and this is for two reasons: one, I can do whatever I want; and, two, if you’re going to walk the walk, you have to talk the talk. I know precisely how uncomfortable I’m going to be with my body on display. But I also know that I have amazing friends and colleagues, many of whom are proud of me for making the decision to wear the costume and who have told me that I’ll look great. So when you’re hanging out at Detroit Fanfare this year (and you better be!) and you go to the adult’s costume party and you see a short, solid Red Sonja hanging out with the coolest geeks you’ll ever meet, feel free to come up and say hello. Also, let me know how the chain-mail turns out, because I’m hoping to get the costume at the Renaissance Festival and I’m pretty sure the artisans are going to do the most kick-ass job imaginable.

Kelly Explores: Geek Girls – DON’T Tell Me I Don’t Belong [Censored]

Fair warning: I’m about to use a lot of swear words.

I’ve heard a rumor that women don’t belong in geek culture. It’s not a new rumor, by any means; it’s been hanging around for the past thirty years or so, but it’s come back into the spotlight recently. There have been some really awesome responses in the blogosphere to all of this, but I’d like to add my voice to the masses. So let me throw this down for all of you jerks out there (male AND female AND gender-neutral) who seem to think that women don’t belong in your happy little world of geekitude:

This content is censored.

This content is censored.

I don’t need to prove anything to you. I don’t need to have loved something from THE VERY BEGINNING BECAUSE OH MY GOD THAT’S ALL YOU CAN DO in order to be on your level. I don’t need to know every nook and cranny of Doctor Who in order to be a fan. Look, [Censored], I like the show. Matt Smith is my first Doctor. Get over it.

I don’t need to defend myself for claiming to be a geek. I’m getting a graduate degree in [Censoredliterature with a focus on comic books and paranormal romance, you self-serving, misogynistic [Censored]. If anyone has the right to claim the geek crown, it’s me. I risk my academic career with every article I write because I think it’s important that geek culture be included in academia. I may not be involved with cosplay (yet, I might add) and I may not be able to name every single incarnation of Green Lantern. But you know what I can do? Research that [Censored] in less than 30 minutes and make you look exactly like the tool you are. So, [Censored] [Censored] and go back to the hole that you crawled out of in the first place.

If you think that it’s EVER okay to tell ANYONE that they don’t belong, you’re part of what’s wrong with the world. Why do you give a [Censored] if someone’s only seen one flipping episode of Star Trek? They like the same damned thing you do, but you don’t want to open up your myopic sphere of “appropriately geeky” in order to welcome them. Newcomers to fandoms have fantastic insight, always. They can look at things differently. They can make you see things from another point of view. If you have a problem with that, you obviously have a problem with expanding your mind and contemplating ideas without absolutely accepting them. What sort of [Censored] philistine do you think you are? Get over yourself.

Furthermore, if you want to claim that “booth babes” are only modeling for attention from men that they wouldn’t deign to be sexually involved with, I have news for you: the sexuality of “booth babes” isn’t any of your [Censored] business in the first place, and your inability to credit a woman who is attractive according to mainstream media with the mere idea that she might actually know what she’s talking about? It’s disgusting. You’re disgusting. Why are you disgusting? Because you seem to be under the impression that women display themselves solely for you. Get a life, [Censored]. And get a clue while you’re at it. If I decide to dress in next-to-nothing or if I decide to dress in a burqa, I’m not doing it for your [Censored] pleasure, I’m doing it because I [Censoredwant to. I exist for a hell of a lot more than your spank bank, thanks very much, and my decision to dress a certain way or act a certain way or portray a certain character is done for me. Go worship yourself in the closest pond, Narcissus; we don’t want you here.

I wish I could say I’m surprised by the fact that any of this is still even an issue, but I’m not. Not even in the slightest. Why? Because patriarchy. Because no matter how hard a woman tries to just be herself and express herself, she’s always going to be judged for it. Because when men dress up as Spider-Man and Batman and Wolverine, it’s totally cool; but when a woman dresses up as Emma Frost or Red Sonja or Slave Leia, it’s because she’s a slut who wants attention. Because people still blame women for being sexually assaulted when they dress in a sexy outfit instead of blaming the [Censored] morons who assault them.

Geek culture is for EVERYONE, and it’s supposed to be one of the ultimate safe spaces. If you can’t accept that, maybe you should be the one getting all of the offensive questions.

Kelly Explores: Do I Wait for the Trade, or Read Single Issues? A Newcomer’s Perspective

As a comics noob, I’ve run into a few walls here and there in finding things that I enjoy reading. I’m enjoying the current run of Captain America in all of its weirdness, and I was able to pick it up from the first issue. I’ve also picked up the current run of X-Men, Avengers Arena, and Red Sonja, from the first issues. I’m sure most of the readers on this site aren’t comic noobs, but you can read this for the sheer factor of watching a new comic reader blossom and learn as she goes.

Abraham on the Walking DeadI read the current run of Hawkeye in the first volume of the trade that Marvel released, and I loved it. I wasn’t sure if I should continue by picking up additional issues, or if I should just wait for the next trade. This was problematic because 1.) I couldn’t remember which issue ended volume one, and 2.) I didn’t know when the next trade would be released. Obviously, this is information you can get from your friendly comic book store proprietors. And the Internet. But I’m sometimes lazy.

I ended up waiting for the second volume of Hawkeye to come out, and I’m glad I did. I like the feel of a trade better than single issues, and I like the lack of advertising. I hate advertisements with the passion of a thousand fires. But I also like Hawkeye enough to now switch to the single issues, because if I have to wait six more months to find out what happens, I may literally rip my hair out. So, single issues it is. Same for Saga. I. Cannot. Wait. For. More.

On the other hand, I’m also reading Morning Glories, which I enjoy, but I’m not hugely engaged with it. It’s a nice sort of side-read. I don’t mind waiting for trades for Morning Glories because if I were to get the single issues, I’d just have to go back and read the three issues before the current one to remember what the hell was happening.

My cousin wants to start collecting The Walking Dead single issues, numbers 1 through 100, simply to say he has them. He just wants that collection to hold on to. He’s really passionate about it, and I almost feel bad for him because it’s going to cost him a fortune in time and money to find what he’s looking for. So, if you’re a collector or you like the satisfaction of having an intact collection, definitely go for single issues. My cousin is really annoyed with himself that he didn’t start his collection from the beginning, so I guess it’s nice to have that foresight going into a series.

I think I’ll be glad I have the single issues of Captain America. Not for actual monetary value, assuming they ever have any, but because I can look at my collection and have a little smile and think to myself, “Hey, this is what you started out with. Remember?” So here’s how I’ve decided to tackle my own comic collecting:

1.) Always pick up the first issue if it’s a series you think you’ll love.

I’ll give a series 3-5 issues. If I’m not feeling it after 5 issues, but still want to read, I’ll wait for the trades from there on out. It’s less costly and I obviously don’t enjoy the series or the run of the series enough to want each issue as it comes out.

2.) If you just have to see the letters pages, pick up any single issues you can.
There are no advertisements splitting up the action in trades, but there are also no letters pages, which can sometimes be disappointing, depending on what you’re reading. And when those letters pages can have sketches from fans and really insightful info, you’re missing out.

3.) If it’s an older story, just get the trade.
Seriously, who has the time or money to get every single issue of Preacher? I sure as hell don’t, and I love the story. Trades it is.

Do you have your own way to decide between single issues and trades? Any tips or tricks for the comics newcomer? Leave it in a comment!

Kelly Explores: Saga and Philosophy

[In preparation for the discussion during the Wonderworld Comics Book Club on Saga this weekend, I am happy to release the third part of Kelly’s exploration into Saga. You can read the first part here, and the second part here. Again, this article talks about sensitive adult topics (Larry)]

I’ve already written about the position of women and the male gaze in Saga. Now, I’d like to draw everyone’s attention to a very small discussion between Marko and Alana when they first met. They’re discussing a book that Alana treasures dearly, and the two of them have read into the novel that it’s a commentary on the war that is currently affecting both of them. Marko then makes a suggestion that’s intense and terrifying:

Saga

Saga

“What if the writer is suggesting that war will never end, that it’s a self-perpetuating cycle of pointless brutality that can only be ‘stopped’ with more war?”

Marko’s question is a direct allusion to perpetual war theory, which is frankly something I would never have expected to see in a comic book. As soon as I read Marko’s question, I sat back and just stared at my copy of volume two for a minute.

As I’ve previously stated, I’m newly-returned to comic books. I was into them when I was young, fell out of them, and am now into them again. Now that I’m older, wiser, more educated, more experienced, more depressed, more cynical, whatever you want to call it, I couldn’t be happier that I wandered into Wonderworld Comics one day and asked for recommendations.

You see, comics, just like any other type of literature, expand the mind. They force you to look outside yourself and be immersed into a storyline that can be very threatening, very exciting, very breathtaking. In addition to the writing itself, the illustrations move the story along, which is something you frankly don’t see in novels.

I realize that to some people, comics are juvenile and pointless. But they’re a very legitimate field of academic and artistic study, and if anyone doubts their legitimacy for an instant, I’d highly recommend they read Saga.

Saga deals with rape culture, race relations, war, family, various cultural expectations for various genders, and a host of other issues that you don’t really see a critical perspective on in mainstream young adult literature (if you doubt this, I draw your attention to Twilight, and I need say no more) or popular adult literature (have you READ anything by Dan Brown or James Patterson? They aren’t exactly addressing cultural norms).

All in all, I have to say, I’d be recommending comic books over literature for cultural theory questions any day.